Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats — In-Depth Analysis & Breakdown 2026

Introduction

The Seattle Seahawks vs Chicago Bears matchup on December 26, 2024 was one of the most unusual, low-scoring contests of the NFL season, ending with a final score of Seattle 6, Chicago 3. This clash was significant for many reasons — unusual scoring, defensive dominance, turnovers, and a showcase of how disciplined play and situational football can define a game.

In this article, we’ll dive deep into:

• Key team performance metrics
• Individual player statistics
• Tactical elements that shaped the game
• Comparisons to historical trends in Seahawks–Bears meetings
• What the stats mean for both teams’ future prospects

Game Overview: Seahawks 6, Bears 3

On a chilly night at Soldier Field in Chicago, the Seahawks (with a 9-7 record) eked out a narrow victory over the Bears (4-12). Neither offense found the end zone — all points came from field goals — marking one of the few “defensive slugfests” of the entire 2024 season.

Scoring Summary

• SEA 3–0 – Jason Myers 27-yard field goal
• SEA 3–3 – Cairo Santos 42-yard field goal
• SEA 6–3 – Jason Myers 50-yard field goal

This was a game where points were at a premium. The contest did not feature a single touchdown — a rarity in the modern NFL.

Team Performance Metrics

Statistic	Seattle Seahawks	Chicago Bears
Total Yards	265	179
Passing Yards	143	76
Rushing Yards	122	103
Plays	51	58
Yards/Play	5.2	3.1
Turnovers	1	1
Time of Possession	29:40	30:20

These numbers tell us a story:

• Seattle’s offensive yardage advantage (265 vs 179) was clear, even though neither team could convert that advantage into touchdowns.
• Chicago’s offense struggled to sustain drives, especially through the air.
• Both teams committed turnovers, but aggressive defensive fronts kept scoring minimal.

Passing Game Breakdown

Seattle Seahawks Pass Game

Geno Smith (QB)

• 17/23 completions
• 160 passing yards
• 0 TDs, 0 INTs

Geno Smith was efficient — completing a high percentage of his throws and avoiding mistakes. However, the Seahawks offense couldn’t convert those yards into touchdowns, highlighting a lack of big-play success through the air on this night.

Seattle’s passing game was methodical, short-to-intermediate routes dominating rather than explosive plays downfield.

Chicago Bears Pass Game

Caleb Williams (QB)

• 16/28 completions
• 122 passing yards
• 0 TDs, 1 INT

Caleb Williams was under constant pressure due to Seattle’s pass rush. His lower completion percentage and interception reflected how disruptive Seattle’s defense could be when playing disciplined.

Williams’ performance was modest by his standards, but it also underscored the Bears’ offensive struggles to maintain drives and convert yardage into points.

Rushing Game Comparison

While not a high-octane ground clash, the rushing stats provide insights into each team’s offensive approach:

Seahawks Rushing Leaders

• Zach Charbonnet – 15 carries, 57 yards
• Kenny McIntosh – 7 carries, 46 yards
• Geno Smith (scrambles) – 3 carries, 19 yards

Seattle’s run game was steady, helping the team control the clock and keep Chicago’s defense honest. Charbonnet’s physical running and McIntosh’s burst were key in sustaining offensive rhythm.

Bears Rushing Leaders

• D’Andre Swift – 12 carries, 53 yards
• Caleb Williams – 5 carries, 37 yards

Chicago leaned on Swift, but was unable to break off any explosive runs. The Bears’ moderate ground attack kept them in the game but didn’t offer the strategic edge needed to take the lead.

Receiving Breakdowns

Seattle Seahawks Receiving

Player	Receptions	Yards	Long
Noah Fant	4	43	15
D.K. Metcalf	3	42	23
Jaxon Smith-Njigba	3	32	19
Tyler Lockett	3	20	15
Zach Charbonnet	3	19	11
Puka Nacua / Others	minimal	minimal	—

Seattle distributed passes across its offense, but the results stayed unspectacular. This is typically not a Seattle trait — as the team often showcases more dynamic passing — but game conditions were not conducive to big aerial gains.

Chicago Bears Receiving

Player	Receptions	Yards	Long
D. Moore	6	54	18
D. Swift	4	28	24
Keenan Allen	5	25	16
Rome Odunze	1	15	15

Chicago’s top receiving threat was D.J. Moore, but even his output was limited in a defensive struggle. The Bears simply could not establish any consistent rhythm in the passing game.

Defense vs Offense — The Tactical Battle

Seattle Defense

Seattle’s defensive front played a huge role — pressuring Caleb Williams repeatedly, leading to sacks and that crucial interception. While official sack numbers on this box score show Seattle lost more yardage to sacks (7-46 Chicago vs 3-17 Seattle), the widespread pressure collapsed multiple Chicago drives.

Chicago Defense

Chicago’s defense also made life difficult for Seattle. The Bears limited the Seahawks to just 6 points, forcing field goals instead of touchdowns, which kept the game competitive until the end.

Both defenses made critical third-down stops, tightening the game and fueling the low-scoring outcome.

Turnovers and Hidden Game Changers

One of the defining stats was that each team committed one turnover — Seattle lost a fumble on a return, and Chicago threw an interception.

These turnovers neutralized offensive momentum on both sides and effectively preserved the close score throughout. In tight games like this, turnovers often turn the tide.

Historical Raider: Seahawks vs Bears Matchups

While this article focuses on the 2024 contest, statistics from past meetings illustrate the evolving nature of this sporadic rivalry:

• In 2021, the teams scored more points in an 18–18 tie, with quarterbacks and running backs producing balanced offensive output.
• Historically, personnel like Russell Wilson and Marshawn Lynch dominated earlier clashes with higher yardage and scoring — a stark contrast to the grind-it-out 6-3 battle in 2024.

This range of outcomes shows that match dynamics can vary dramatically depending on era, strategy, and roster makeup.

What This Game Reveals About Both Teams

Seattle Seahawks

• Led by efficient quarterback play from Geno Smith, Seattle showed they don’t need explosive plays to win.
• Defensive discipline and controlled offense sealed the victory.
• The ground game helped sustain drives and close out the game.

Seattle’s ability to win low-scoring games is a hallmark of veteran teams with strong defensive identities.

Chicago Bears

• Despite an underwhelming record, the Bears’ defense kept them competitive deep into the game.
• Offense struggled to find consistency, especially in the passing game.
• The low score reflects Chicago’s ongoing offensive challenges in 2024.

For Chicago, this game was a case study in missed opportunities — yardage didn’t translate effectively into scoring.

Player Of The Game Candidates — Stats Perspective

Offensive Standouts

Geno Smith (SEA)

• Efficient passing — no interceptions
• Managed game tempo effectively

D.J. Moore (CHI)

• Led Bears in receptions and receiving yards

Defensive Impact

• Seattle’s defense forced the Bears into a low-product offense and created a turnover — key to preserving the narrow lead.

Even the “scoring leaders” on this night — Jason Myers and Cairo Santos — were technically special teams performers, providing all the points in this low-scoring clash.

What was the final score and key context for the Seahawks vs Bears game?

The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Chicago Bears 6-3 on December 26, 2024. It was a rainy, defensive struggle—the lowest-scoring NFL game of the 2024 season—with no touchdowns scored. Seattle’s Jason Myers kicked two field goals, while Chicago’s Cairo Santos added one.

2. Who were the top passing performers in the Seahawks vs Bears match?

Seattle’s Geno Smith completed 17 of 23 passes for 160 yards, 0 touchdowns, and 0 interceptions (92.7 passer rating). Chicago’s Caleb Williams went 16 of 28 for 122 yards, 0 touchdowns, and 1 interception (thrown late to Riq Woolen, sealing the win).

3. Which players led rushing in the Seahawks vs Bears player stats?

Seattle’s Zach Charbonnet rushed 15 times for 57 yards (long of 11). Kenny McIntosh added 7 carries for 46 yards (long of 25). For Chicago, D’Andre Swift led with 12 carries for 53 yards. Seattle totaled 122 rushing yards on 25 attempts.

4. Who stood out in receiving for the Seahawks vs Bears game?

Seattle’s Noah Fant led with 4 receptions for 43 yards (long of 15). DK Metcalf had 3 catches for 42 yards but drew penalties for unnecessary roughness. Chicago’s receivers struggled overall, with limited production amid poor passing yards (only 76 net passing after sacks).

5. How did sacks and pressures impact player stats in the matchup?

Chicago sacked Geno Smith 3 times (losing 17 yards). Seattle’s defense dominated, sacking Caleb Williams 7 times (losing 46 yards)—extending his rookie record to 67 sacks on the season. Leonard Williams led with 2 sacks and multiple pressures.

6. What defensive highlights appeared in Seahawks vs Bears player stats?

Seattle’s Riq Woolen had a game-clinching interception late in the fourth quarter, ending Williams’ streak of passes without a pick. Seattle’s pass rush generated heavy pressure, holding Chicago to just 179 total yards.

7. How did special teams and kicking contribute to the score?

Jason Myers (SEA) made field goals of 27 and (implied second) yards for all 6 points. Cairo Santos (CHI) kicked a field goal for Chicago’s only points. No extra points were needed due to no touchdowns.

8. What were the overall team yardage and efficiency stats?

Seattle had 265 total yards (143 passing net, 122 rushing) on 51 plays. Chicago managed only 179 total yards (76 passing net, 103 rushing) on 58 plays. Seattle converted better on third downs despite the low output.

9. Were there any notable penalties or incidents involving players?

DK Metcalf (SEA) drew multiple unnecessary roughness flags, including a headbutt and shoves, earning penalties that hurt field position but didn’t lead to ejection. The game featured physical play amid rainy conditions.

10. How do these Seahawks vs Bears player stats compare to season trends?

The game highlighted Seattle’s road strength (improved to 6-1 away) and run game reliance, while exposing Chicago’s offensive line issues (Williams heavily pressured) and defensive resilience (held Seattle without a TD). It boosted Seattle’s playoff push and marked another tough outing for Chicago’s rookie QB.

Conclusion

The Seahawks vs Bears matchup in December 2024 was a masterclass in situational football and defensive grit. In a game where neither offense found the end zone, strategic decisions, turnovers, field goals, and timely defensive plays dictated the result. Seattle’s 6-3 win stands out statistically not only for the scoreline but also for how both teams executed under pressure.

From player performance stats to tactical breakdowns, this game serves as a reminder that football is ultimately a game of details — where every yard, drive and decision matters even when the scoreboard doesn’t light up.

ALSO READ MORE IP Coin News: The Rise of Story Protocol’s $IP Token 2026